I participated in building the computer network we all know today and almost everyone but me calls the Internet, with or without the initial capital. However, my opinion forming habits are from the late twentieth century, which means I grew up intellectually on newspapers, periodicals, broadcasts, libraries, and classes, not computer networks. Those habits linger, but the first source of information and opinion for most people now, even septuagenarian cave dwellers such as myself, has become the computer network.
Fifty years ago, I ordered books from Blackwell’s of Oxford and was happy to get the books in a month. Today, I am upset when a computer takes more than two seconds to respond. This accelerated information cadence has changed the way everyone thinks.
The old way was question-search-ponder-respond. New question. Today it is question-response-new question-new response-new question-new-response… No more forced pondering while waiting for a response, which could take months.
Unfortunately for us today, the pondering step is the most difficult and creative step. And the most valuable because pondering accesses inner resources, not inflow from the outside. Pondering comes from us, not others. Consequently, public discourse is easier and more voluminous than ever before, but the fire of its humanity is dampened. Thoughtless blurts retweeted ad nauseum wash in tidal waves through the forum.
Today, the assassination of Charlie Kirk is pounding back and forth in the echo chamber. Any assassination is deplorable. The end of the life of a popular, eloquent and forceful personality attracts immediate and intense attention, but, today, little pondering.
The U.S. has seen many assassinations: Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, Lee Harvey Oswald, Martin Luther King come to mind.
How Kirk’s death will be judged by future generations is unknowable, but current technology means the public has read about his death more, but pondered it less, today than any of these previous deaths in the short weeks after their occurrence.
Socrates was executed 2500 years ago for corrupting the youth of Athens. The justice of his death and its effect on public discourse is still discussed in classrooms. How will Charlie Kirk’s effect on the youth of today be discussed even ten years from now?
