China’s Woes

The decline in China’s economy has occupied the economic press lately. Fifty years ago, I studied more in classical Chinese than English. I was working on a PhD. thesis on China of the Confucian era. Many of the basic tenets of traditional Chinese government and economics go back to Confucius and his followers in the Yellow River Valley, like much of western tradition goes back to Athens and Jerusalem of classical antiquity, which was roughly contemporaneous with Confucius. Maybe sunspots or a burst of cosmic radiation spurred civilization onward, although that ignores the great civilizations of Africa and the Americas.

It grieves me that I can’t say “I told you so,” to those who thought China would never get beyond the chaos of Mao because I didn’t tell anyone.

That bit of personal history has shaped my views of China. In the 1970s, China was in the bitter throes of the cultural revolution, but I concluded that China, if it could ever shake off its legacy of western colonial oppression and poverty, was a better platform for 20th century western market-driven capitalism than Max Weber’s characterization of the protestant ethic.

I wish I had published those views to refer to now, but I didn’t, so you will have to take my word for them. Herrlee Creel, my mentor at the University of Chicago, hinted at this view in his bestseller of 1949, Confucius: The Man and the Myth, in which he argued that Confucius held democratic ideals. I do not entirely agree with my mentor on that, but Joseph Needham’s encyclopedic Science and Civilization in China convinces most readers that traditional Chinese society fostered scientific and technical innovation. I assert that Confucian world view fostered individual initiative bolstered by a vigorous familial system. A budding entrepreneur in traditional China was more likely to receive encouragement and financial support than a western protestant in recent centuries.

The last decade of the 20th century and the first two decades of the 21st century have proved me right. Family support of entrepreneurship has helped the contemporary rise of the Chinese economy. It grieves me that I can’t say “I told you so,” to those who thought China would never get beyond the chaos of Mao because I didn’t tell anyone.

A common trope is a Chinese gangster who starts firing a weapon and can’t stop until the magazine is empty. The trope is pure xenophobia and racism, but it reminds me of the Chinese official policies on Covid-19.

I read a lot of popular American detective and mystery fiction written in the 1930s and 40s. A common trope is a Chinese gangster who starts firing a weapon and can’t stop until the magazine is empty. The trope is pure xenophobia and racism, but it reminds me of the Chinese official policies on Covid-19.

China’s initial reaction to Covid-19 was a crackdown: mandatory masks, draconian quarantines, workers locked in factories, and whole cities shutdown over scattered cases of the virus. The policy was successful. China kept their death toll down and their economy led the world in the early years of the pandemic.

But like the gangster with the machine gun, the CCP could not take its finger off the trigger until the gun was empty; the rest of the world was in recovery and Covid-19 restrictions were holding China back when Emperor Xi Jinping let up and abruptly tossed the zero-Covid weapon aside; Covid-19 roared back. Death tolls rose and China’s internal economy suffered.

Information on current events in China passes through many filters. Closest to the ground, reports are tailored for a favorable response from the next level up in the government. The Chinese government filters and massages published information to shore up their position. Then western agendas kick into gear and add their own layers of distortion. And finally, your lowly servant here is picking and choosing to tell a story that will keep your interest.

I won’t go into the details of China’s current economic woes. I suggest reading The Economist on the subject or any business publication for more information. Most are gloating over the inherent weakness of authoritarian governments.

I agree that authoritarians are weak, I won’t go into why I think that, but I haven’t seen that the commentators have taken into consideration the peculiar nature of traditional China’s authoritarian empire, which has failed, recovered, and triumphed over and over for the last two thousand years. A more resilient empire than the Romans or the British.

There’s an old Chinese saying: The mountains are high and the emperor is distant. (Shān gāo, huángdì yuǎn.) It’s used in many situations, but slow, unreliable communication in the empire frequently served as a buffer between alternate centers of power and culture and the sometimes inept central government located wherever the emperor happened to sit.

I am forced to wonder if the flattened mountains and shortened roads of twenty-first century communications and transportation have worsened China’s current economic woes. The west has a century of experience with rapid communications and a well-informed populace. China does not.

I am watching carefully.

Hold fast. Be patient. Keep trying.

Sam Spade Mug Shot

My friend Bill sent me a link to a Huffpost on the meme frenzy following posting of P01135809’s mug shot in Atlanta. Here’s another collection. Most of the memes are amusing, even side-splitting, but none of them notices the Sam Spade-Maltese Falcon connection, which happens to delight me.

P01135809’s mug shot is a study in Vs, like Dashiell Hammett’s Sam Spade of the Maltese Falcon:

“Samuel Spade’s jaw was long and bony, his chin a jutting v under the more flexible v of his mouth. His nostrils curved back to make another, smaller, v. His yellow-grey eyes were horizontal. The v motif was picked up again by thickish brows rising outward from twin creases above a hooked nose, and his pale brown hair grew down—from high flat temples—in a point on his forehead. He looked rather pleasantly like a blond satan.”

I imagine P01135809 working on his pose in front of a mirror, modeling himself on Sam Spade. P01135809’s pale brown hair is flounced into a v and the v of his forehead lines, brows, and eyes meet at the point of another v that comes up from twin creases aimed toward the bridge of his nose. His lipless mouth and round chin underline the v’s pointing to his leering eyes.

P01135809 does not look ” rather pleasantly like a blond satan,” He has the “this ain’t nice” leer of someone who thinks he may have hatched a hemorrhoid or realized that his partner was killed by the bimbo with whom he thought he was falling in love.

I consider The Maltese Falcon to be a masterwork, but I also see it as close to the light touch of Hammett’s most popularly successful work, The Thin Man, not the detective stories he wrote previously. I don’t see Sam Spade as the swashbuckling and justice-seeking hero he is often made out to be.

The pursuit of the falcon is massive joke, a cavalcade of characters, portrayed comically in the 1941 John Huston movie by the geniuses of Mary Astor, Sidney Greenstreet, and Peter Lore. The global wild goose chase draws Spade in, only to dump him when the bird is revealed to be a fraud. In the end, Spade loses the falcon and sacrifices the femme fatale he may have loved only to avenge his dismal two-timing partner, Miles Archer, whom he didn’t much like.

Nice choice of models, P01135809.

Lessons in Looney Tunes Democracy

The indictments against former president Trump trouble me. I’m not a lawyer, but as I see it, an indictment against a former president is unprecedented, but aside from that, they are legal business as usual: A prosecutor suspects a crime has been committed. Random voters in a jurisdiction are called together in a grand jury panel. The prosecutor presents evidence against the accused, then an indictment is issued when a majority of the grand jury votes that the expense and trouble of a trial is justified.

An indictment is not a statement of guilt or innocence, only that the evidence is worth pursuing. A trial follows; evidence both for and against the accused is presented. Then a judge or a trial jury decides guilt or innocence. State and federal grand juries differ in detail but are for the most part the same.

To this observer, the former president is cutting off the presidential limb he sits on. This is Looney Tunes.

Indictments are expensive in time and resources, a drawn out and elaborate ritual designed to make it difficult to obtain a conviction against an accused person. The deck is intentionally stacked against the prosecution. Therefore, prosecutors seldom pursue an indictment unless they have a strong case. Over ninety percent of indictments result in a conviction, which we taxpayers payers who foot the bill for grand juries and trials should applaud.

Despite all speculation over the strengths and weaknesses of the cases and a “past performance does not guarantee future results” warning label, odds are high that at least one of the former president’s three indictments will result in a conviction. With more indictments expected the likelihood that at least one strand of spaghetti will stick to the wall approaches certainty.

Not a typical post-presidency, but if Trump had not been president and didn’t have a major political party backing him, only his friends, family, and associates would care. In this world, crimes are committed and criminals are punished.

Nothing special to see here folks.

This week the New York Times reported that two conservative law professors, Federalist Society types, have suggested that Trump is ineligible for federal office, unless two-thirds of both the Senate and the House of Representatives vote to grant him amnesty for his conduct on January 6, 2021. The former president may have more than indictments to fend off in court before returning to the office he covets.

Election winners love democracy, losers not so much until the next election. The marvel of democracies is that the losers always have a next election to win. That next election depends on the continuity of the democratic system that validates elections and governs terms of office. In the U.S., the system is derived from the U.S. constitution that is the basic contract between the U.S. government and its citizens. Federal officials swear to uphold the constitution, which, in turn, empowers them to carry out their functions.

The former president has repeatedly questioned the authority of the constitution to govern the presidency and the validity of the election process. To this observer, the former president is cutting off the presidential limb he sits on. This is Looney Tunes.

The U.S. constitution has survived two centuries to become the governing document of the wealthy and powerful nation. Is it possible that it is coming to an end??

I hope not.

Hold fast. Be patient. Keep trying.